Hadith plagiarized from the Bible
Part 2)


The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have invented many falsehoods about Abraham – whom GOD appointed the imam or leader for all mankind (imamu lin nass). The evil falsehoods which the Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah have fabricated about this important Rasul or Messenger of GOD seek to corrupt the image of Abraham, his wife, his son and family.
Again these falsehoods are all plagiarized from the Christian Bible. These falsehoods also completely contradict the Quran. We will show proofs from the Quran and expose these lies against the good Prophet and Messenger Abraham and his family.
Firstly here is one concocted story from the Christian Bible. This Biblical slander against the Prophet Abraham forms the basis for the false hadith that has been written down by the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah. This is taken from the Book of Genesis :

Genesis 16 : 1 - 16
Hagar and Ishmael
1 Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian maidservant named Hagar; 2 so she said to Abram, "The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her."
Abram agreed to what Sarai said. 3 So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife. 4 He slept with Hagar, and she conceived.
When she knew she was pregnant, she began to despise her mistress. 5 Then Sarai said to Abram, "You are responsible for the wrong I am suffering. I put my servant in your arms, and now that she knows she is pregnant, she despises me. May the LORD judge between you and me."
6 "Your servant is in your hands," Abram said. "Do with her whatever you think best." Then Sarai mistreated Hagar; so she fled from her.
7 The angel of the LORD found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur. 8 And he said, "Hagar, servant of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?"
"I'm running away from my mistress Sarai," she answered.
9 Then the angel of the LORD told her, "Go back to your mistress and submit to her." 10 The angel added, "I will so increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count."
11 The angel of the LORD also said to her: "You are now with child and you will have a son. You shall name him Ishmael, [a] for the LORD has heard of your misery. 12 He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone's hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward [b] all his brothers."
13 She gave this name to the LORD who spoke to her: "You are the GOD who sees me," for she said, "I have now seen [c] the One who sees me." 14 That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi [d] ; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered.
15 So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne. 16 Abram was eighty-six years old when Hagar bore him Ishmael.

Now here is the fake hadith from the Bukhari collection which forms the basis of the Ahlul Sunnah’s lies about Abraham. Note the extreme similarity between the Christian Bible and the fake Bukhari hadith.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 584:
Narrated Ibn Abbas:
When Abraham had differences with his wife), (because of her jealousy of Hajar, Ishmael's mother), he took Ishmael and his mother and went away. They had a water-skin with them containing some water, Ishmael's mother used to drink water from the water-skin so that her milk would increase for her child. When Abraham reached Mecca, he made her sit under a tree and afterwards returned home. Ishmael's mother followed him, and when they reached Kada', she called him from behind, 'O Abraham! To whom are you leaving us?' He replied, '(I am leaving you) to GOD’s (Care).' She said, 'I am satisfied to be with GOD.' She returned to her place and started drinking water from the water-skin, and her milk increased for her child. When the water had all been used up, she said to herself, 'I'd better go and look so that I may see somebody.' She ascended the Safa mountain and looked, hoping to see somebody, but in vain. When she came down to the valley, she ran till she reached the Marwa mountain. She ran to and fro (between the two mountains) many times. They she said to herself, 'i'd better go and see the state of the child,' she went and found it in a state of one on the point of dying. She could not endure to watch it dying and said (to herself), 'If I go and look, I may find somebody.' She went and ascended the Safa mountain and looked for a long while but could not find anybody. Thus she completed seven rounds (of running) between Safa and Marwa. Again she said (to herself), 'I'd better go back and see the state of the child.' But suddenly she heard a voice, and she said to that strange voice, 'Help us if you can offer any help.' Lo! It was Gabriel (who had made the voice). Gabriel hit the earth with his heel like this (Ibn 'Abbas hit the earth with his heel to Illustrate it), and so the water gushed out. Ishmael's mother was astonished and started digging.

This is the false Biblical story that has been reproduced in the hadith of Bukhari about the jealousy of Abraham’s wife Sarah towards a supposed bondwoman by the name of Hagar whom she ‘gave’ to her husband Abraham to bed. According to this false hadith, at that time Sarah herself could not bear children and decided to give her bondwoman as a mistress to her husband.

Firstly the names Sarah and Hajar are not mentioned anywhere in the Quran therefore the Quran cannot confirm these names that are mentioned in the Bible as well as in the false hadith books.

The idea that a Prophet and Rasul of GOD would even have a slavegirl in his household is repulsive of all the teachings of the Quran and what GOD taught to Abraham and Moses. The Prophets of GOD came to free slaves - NOT to have slave girls in their household. This is what the Prophet taught us :

Surah [90 : 4 - 16]
[90.4] Certainly We have created man in distress.
[90.5] Does he think that no one has power over him?
[90.6] He shall say: I have wasted much wealth.
[90.7] Does he think that no one sees him?
[90.8] Have We not given him two eyes,
[90.9] And a tongue and two lips,
[90.10] And pointed out to him the two conspicuous ways?
[90.11] But he would not attempt the uphill road,
[90.12] And what will make you comprehend what the uphill road is?
[90.13] (It is) the setting free of a slave,
[90.14] Or the giving of food in a day of hunger
[90.15] To an orphan, having relationship,
[90.16] Or to the poor man lying in the dust.

GOD will show man two paths (two conspicuous ways ?). He must choose the path that requires greater commitment and effort. That is the path of freeing the slaves, feeding the hungry, feeding the orphans and the poor man. Never will GOD ask anyone, especially His chosen Prophets and Rasuls to keep slave girls in their homes and then take their slave girls as mistresses.

Also GOD’s teaching for mankind is that men should always marry the women before bedding them but here the false hadith says the Prophet Abraham slept with a slave girl.
But the falsehood against Abraham and his family continues. Long before the Quran, the Christians had already fabricated another slander against the Almighty GOD that He had commanded the Prophet Abraham to sacrifice his son. The evil slander by the Christians makes both GOD and Abraham parties to a barbaric ritual sacrifice of a human life. Even the very thought of this evil slander is preposterous. Here is the Biblical slander against GOD and Abraham :

Genesis 22
Abraham Tested
1 Some time later GOD tested Abraham. He said to him, "Abraham!" "Here I am," he replied.
2 Then GOD said, "Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about."
3 Early the next morning Abraham got up and saddled his donkey. He took with him two of his servants and his son Isaac. When he had cut enough wood for the burnt offering, he set out for the place GOD had told him about. 4 On the third day Abraham looked up and saw the place in the distance. 5 He said to his servants, "Stay here with the donkey while I and the boy go over there. We will worship and then we will come back to you."
6 Abraham took the wood for the burnt offering and placed it on his son Isaac, and he himself carried the fire and the knife. As the two of them went on together, 7 Isaac spoke up and said to his father Abraham, "Father?"
"Yes, my son?" Abraham replied.
"The fire and wood are here," Isaac said, "but where is the lamb for the burnt offering?"
8 Abraham answered, "GOD himself will provide the lamb for the burnt offering, my son." And the two of them went on together.
9 When they reached the place GOD had told him about, Abraham built an altar there and arranged the wood on it. He bound his son Isaac and laid him on the altar, on top of the wood. 10 Then he reached out his hand and took the knife to slay his son. 11 But the angel of the LORD called out to him from heaven, "Abraham! Abraham!" "Here I am," he replied.
12 "Do not lay a hand on the boy," he said. "Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you fear GOD, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son."
13 Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram [a] caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son. 14 So Abraham called that place The LORD Will Provide. And to this day it is said, "On the mountain of the LORD it will be provided."
15 The angel of the LORD called to Abraham from heaven a second time 16 and said, "I swear by myself, declares the LORD , that because you have done this and have not withheld your son, your only son, 17 I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies, 18 and through your offspring [b] all nations on earth will be blessed, because you have obeyed me."

This is the Biblical story of Abraham wanting to sacrifice his son because allegedly Abraham thought it was GOD’s command. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have swallowed this false Biblical story hook, line and sinker. Until today, to commemorate this slander against GOD and the Prophet Abraham the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah sacrifice goats, camels and cows on the Feast of Sacrifice or Eid Al Adha which also forms one of the cornerstones of their pilgrimage ritual in Mecca.

The story of Abraham trying to sacrifice his son is recorded in the Quran but in completely different detail. The Quran cannot confirm the Biblical story at all. Here is the beautiful Quranic version :

Sura 37
37: 102. When he (Ismail) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said, "My son, I see in my sleep (araa’ fil manami) that I am sacrificing you. What do you think?" He said, "O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You will find me, GOD willing, patient."
37: 103. They both submitted, and he put his forehead down.
37: 104. We called him: "O Abraham.
37: 105. "surely you have confirmed the dream (qad saddakta al ru’ya) ?" We thus reward the righteous.
[The word ‘saddaqta’ means ‘to confirm’. For example refer Surah 66:12 where Mary confirms (saddaqa) the words of her Lord as true].
37: 106. That was an exacting test indeed.
37: 107. We redeemed him with a great sacrifice.
37: 108. And we preserved his history for subsequent generations.
37: 109. Peace be upon Abraham.
37: 110. We thus reward the righteous.
37: 111. He is one of our believing servants.

This is the accurate record in the Quran of Abraham trying to fulfil what he saw in his sleep. But this was definitely NOT a commandment from GOD. It was just what Abraham saw in his sleep. Let us analyse what the Quran says.

Firstly in the narrative above we see the following:

Surah 37: 102. When he (Ismail) grew enough to work with him, he (Abraham) said, "My son, I see in my sleep (araa’ fil manaami) that I am sacrificing you. What do you think?" He said, "O my father, do what you are commanded to do. You will find me, GOD willing, patient."
When GOD commands his Messengers to do something He gives them clear commandments which leave no room for misunderstanding by the Messengers. See the following verses :
Surah 10:15 “when our signs are recited to them, clear signs”
Surah 7:101 “their messengers came to them with clear signs”
Surah 2:87 “We gave Jesus son of Mary clear signs”
Surah 2:92 “Moses came to you with clear signs”

Hence it is not likely that GOD would give Abraham unclear commands such that after seeing something in his sleep (manami), we find Abraham asking his son ‘What do you think?’ This cannot be the behaviour of a Messenger of GOD when carrying out GOD’s commands.

Then we see that a command to kill one’s own child totally contradicts GOD’s teachings as follows :

[Surah 6.151] “Say: Come I will recite what your Lord has forbidden to you -- that you do not associate anything with Him and show kindness to your parents, and do not slay your children for (fear of) poverty-- We provide for you and for them -- and do not draw nigh to indecencies, those of them which are apparent and those which are concealed, and do not kill the soul which GOD has forbidden except for the requirements of justice; this He has enjoined you with, that you may understand.”

The Prophet taught us GOD’s command that we cannot kill our children even for fear of poverty. So how can GOD command another Prophet to kill his own son as a ‘sacrifice’ ? And the verse further says that we cannot kill any soul except in justice. Where was the justice in Abraham killing his son ? What crime or sin had Abraham’s son committed ?

In the following verse GOD tells us that the killing of children (human sacrifice) is indeed a pagan practice.

[Surah 6.137] “And thus their pagan idols have made fair to the pagan polytheists the killing of their children, that they may cause them to perish and obscure for them their religion; and if GOD had pleased, they would not have done it, therefore leave them and that which they forge.”

GOD’s command to mankind is that the killing of children (human sacrifice) is a pagan practice. Therefore it is impossible for GOD to command Abraham to carry out the pagan practice of killing his own son. Here is another verse from the Quran that forbids the killing of children:

The ulema of course reject all the above verses of the Quran. They would rather believe the Biblical slander that GOD commanded the Prophet Abraham to sacrifice his son. The ulema prefer the barbaric act of killing your own son.
They say that GOD never intended that Abraham’s son would be killed. It was merely a test. Here is another verse that exposes the ulema’s slander against GOD and the Prophet Abraham :
[Surah 60.12] O Prophet! when believing women come to you giving you a pledge that they will not associate aught with GOD, and will not steal, and will not commit fornication, and will not kill their children, and will not bring a calumny which they have forged of themselves, and will not disobey you in what is good, accept their pledge, and ask forgiveness for them from GOD; surely GOD is Forgiving, Merciful.

In this verse the test specifically prescribed by GOD to accept the pledge of believing women includes their promise that they will not kill their children. This is because it is a great sin to kill one’s own child. Therefore it is impossible that GOD would test Abraham in the the exact opposite manner ie by giving Abraham a command to kill his own child.

Would Abraham have known about these commandments by GOD that we should not kill our children ? He certainly would have known because GOD tells us that whatever He revealed in the Quran has been revealed before to Abraham and Moses :

Surah 87 : 18 – 19
“Most surely this is in the earlier scriptures, the scriptures of Ibrahim and Musa.”

Most certainly then GOD had also taught Abraham previously that human sacrifice was a sinful thing to do. But not the Christian Bible. The Christian Bible teaches the falsehood that GOD commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son. Christians also believe that they must perform a cannibalistic type ritual of drinking the blood of Christ who they again believe was ‘sacrificed’ by GOD to atone for human sins. This belief in human sacrifice alone exposes the pagan origins of Christianity. Unfortunately the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have plagiarized this false Christian belief.

And we are told clearly in the Quran that killing an innocent believing soul is a great sin:
"Anyone who kills a believer on purpose, his retribution is Hell, wherein he abides forever, GOD is angry with him, and condemns him, and has prepared for him a terrible retribution." 4:93
The retribution for killing another believer is hellfire. Here is another verse:
"No believer shall kill another believer, unless by mistake.... " 4:92
Again a believer cannot kill another believer. That would be against GOD’s teachings.
We are then told in the Quran that GOD NEVER advocates sin:
" ... Say, "GOD never advocates sin. Are you saying about GOD what you do not know?" Surah 7:28.
After teaching mankind that killing their own children is a pagan act and a sin and that the retribution for the sin of killing a believer is the Hellfire – GOD cannot contradict Himself by giving Abraham a test which requires Abraham to kill his own son.
If we put these facts side by side, we know that Abraham’s son was a good believer, thus killing him would be a sin, and we know that GOD NEVER advocates sin. The truth becomes clear; Abraham had a dream but it was not from GOD.
But because Abraham was a righteous believer "We thus reward the righteous" GOD intervened and saved Abraham’s son. GOD intervened and saved Abraham from commiting a great sin (37:107).
The ulema of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah will however reject all these verses from the Quran. That is because they are disbelievers or kuffar. They will prefer to uphold the Christian Biblical story that GOD commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son.


Just like many other practises which we have described so far, the Sunni and the Shiah too follow many prohibitions on food that is taken almost exactly, word for word from the Christian Bible.

Before we see where they have gone totally wrong, firstly let us see what exactly the Quran makes lawful (HALAL) and unlawful (HARAM) in terms of food.

[Surah 5:3] "Forbidden unto you (for food) are carrion and running blood and swineflesh, and that which hath been dedicated unto any other than GOD.."

The Quran only forbids FOUR TYPES of food ie carrion, running blood, pork and things (any food item) that has been dedicated to something other than GOD (eg on an altar, slaughtered by a human being with a particular identity etc).

The verse also continues with more detail about animals that are dead:
"( also forbidden are) and the strangled, and the dead through beating, and the dead through falling from a height, and that which hath been killed by horns, and the devoured of wild beasts, saving that which ye make lawful, and that which hath been immolated unto idols" (5:3).

Other than this, EVERYTHING ELSE is halal for Muslims. Yes, that would include frogs, crocodiles, alligators, birds and whatever else - AS LONG AS they are good for you. The Arabs say that they can eat desert lizards or dhawab. The founder of Saudi Arabia Abdul Aziz ibn Saud used to feast on desert lizards (dhawab) and desert rats.

[Surah 5:4] "They ask thee (O Muhammad) what is made lawful for them. Say: "ALL GOOD THINGS are made lawful for you. And that which the dogs catch which ye have trained as dogs are trained, ye teach them that which GOD taught you; so eat of that which they catch for you and mention GOD’s name upon it, and observe your duty to GOD. Lo! GOD is swift to take account".
People asked the Prophet "What is made lawful for them ?' The Prophet was commanded to say "ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU". And this includes what your DOGS catch for you (see verse 5:4 above).
This also means that Muslims can keep and rear DOGS and even use the DOGS to catch food. Such food is halal. But many of the sunnis today say it is haram to keep dogs. They hate dogs.
For thousands of years and until today millions of people have been eating porcupine, marsh rats, snakes, crocodiles etc. These animals are much sought after in various countries and people eat them because the animals make up good food. Similarly even the fake hadith records the Arabs eating desert lizards called 'dawwab'. Arabs and Pakistanis also eat locusts and other insects too. The Scandinavians eat an animal called the musk rat. The Amazonian Indians eat a large rodent called the capybara.
For these peoples desert lizards, musk rats and capybara are good food. So let them eat it - according to the Quran it is halal.
Similarly the aboriginal peoples have been eating squirrels, monkeys and other such creatures since GOD created them on the surface of the earth. The human being can eat all these because they are good for them.

These are all HALAL because "ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU" (5:4).

If you follow the Quran, you can eat anything that is good for your body except pork, running blood, dead animals and desecrated food. VERY simple. If you ollow the Quran, you can survive anywhere on GOD’s earth. (I have seen Sunni "tourists" starving themselves in Papua New Guinea. They kept eating bread for three days)
This is because the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have come up with very long lists of foods which they have prohibited. Not surprisingly (because they are all falsehoods) you find differences between the sunnis, shiahs, shafiee, hanafi, maliki, hanbali sub cults etc on what exactly is halal or haram.

For example some say crabs are haram, frogs are haram, birds with talons are haram, animals with canine teeth are haram and other such things. If you refer the book ‘Al Halal Wal Haram Fil Islam’ by Yusuf Qardawi you will understand what I mean. They are not supposed to forbid or make haram all these foods, but the sunni and shiah ulema do not care. They are smarter than GOD.
[Surah 5:87] O ye who believe! Forbid not the good things which GOD hath made lawful for you, and transgress not, Lo! GOD loveth not transgressors.
[Surah 5:88] Eat of that which GOD hath bestowed on you as food lawful and good, and keep your duty to GOD in Whom ye are believers
But the sunni and shiah do not care. They can make unlawful what GOD has made lawful. They are greater than GOD. And where do they get their strange ideas ? You guessed it. The Bible of course.
Another example is that GOD has made lawful to hunt in the sea and to eat anything from the sea. Everything from the sea is halal for eating.
[Surah 5:96] To hunt and to eat of the sea is made lawful for you, a provision for you and for seafarers.."
Therefore for thousands of years Eskimos hunt and eat seals and walruses and whales and all kinds of fish. (What else could they possibly eat ?) And we all eat fish from the sea. Also turtles, sharks, sea cucumbers, crayfish etc. All this is lawful according to GOD and the Prophet in the Quran. But the sunni and shiah have created their own confusing lists of what is lawful and what is not lawful - even from the sea.
For example the Shafiee (or is it the Hanafi) sub cults among the Sunnis say that fish without scales are haram. This would make sharks and certain fishes without scales haram. Some also say that eels are haram because they are serpents. Some say mud crabs are ‘makruh’ or 'not encouraged' to be eaten because they live in two habitats i.e. in water and on land.

Where do these strange ideas come from ? You guessed it folks. It comes from the Christian Bible. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah faith is plagiarized from the Bible.
And here it is :
[Lev 11:9] "These you may eat, of all that are in the waters. Everything in the waters that has fins and scales, whether in the seas or in the rivers, you may eat.
But just like some of the Ahlul Sunnah sects the Bible says you cannot eat the following:
[Lev 11:10] But anything in the seas or the rivers that has not fins and scales, of the swarming (crawling) creatures in the waters and of the living creatures that are in the waters, is an abomination to you.
[Lev 11:11] They shall remain an abomination to you; of their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcasses you shall have in abomination.
[Lev 11:12] Everything in the waters that has not fins and scales is an abomination to you.
This is exactly what some of the Sunnis say ie fish without scales are haram, crabs are haram or "makruh" etc..

Similarly the Ahlul Sunnah have made a list of birds that CANNOT be eaten. Included in this list are the birds of prey and other kinds of birds. They summarise it by saying you cannot eat birds with talons or curved beaks. Again this is only too similar to the following list found in the Bible:

[Lev 11:13] "And these you shall have in abomination among the birds, they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the osprey,
[Lev 11:14] the kite, the falcon according to its kind,
[Lev 11:15] every raven according to its kind,
[Lev 11:16] the ostrich, the nighthawk, the sea gull, the hawk according to its kind,
[Lev 11:17] the owl, the cormorant, the ibis,
[Lev 11:18] the water hen, the pelican, the carrion vulture,
[Lev 11:19] the stork, the heron according to its kind, the hoopoe, and the bat

We can clearly see where the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah prohibition on foods comes from – it is plagiarized completely from the Christian Bible. But surprise, surprise - the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah both allow the eating of locusts and some grasshoppers. As mentioned before - Arabs and Pakistanis do eat locusts. They say these are permissible or halal. It is quite strange because why did they not pick on honey bees, butterflies or cockroaches and made those things halal ? Why include only the locusts and grasshoppers on their halal list ?

The answer lies in the fact that this idea about locusts and grasshoppers being permissible food is also stolen from the Bible. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs copycat the Bible very closely for both their HALAL as well as their HARAM foods.

[Lev 11:21] Yet among the winged insects that go on all fours you may eat those which have legs above their feet, with which to leap on the earth.
[Lev 11:22] Of them you may eat: the locust according to its kind, the bald locust according to its kind, the cricket according to its kind, and the grasshopper according to its kind.

But the Quran has already said "ALL GOOD THINGS ARE MADE LAWFUL FOR YOU" (5:4). Hence some Chinese restaurants serve fried ants, cockroaches and even scorpion. If it is good, why not ? The Quran allows it.

Again this is just one more example of the sources of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah, which cannot be found anywhere in the teachings of the Prophet in the Quran. They are stolen from the Chistians and Jews. These teachings are therefore not part of Islam.
These Sunni and Shiah beliefs are not part of Islam. But you can find these teachings ONLY in the Christian Bible. The Sunnis and the Shiahs are actually the best Christians. Without even realising it now, the Sunnis and Shiahs are following the Christian Bible better than the Christians themsleves.
They have fallen into the trap the Christians have set for them. GOD has already warned the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah :

[Surah 3:69] A party of the followers of the Book desire that they should lead you astray, and they lead not astray but themselves, and they do not perceive.

But it is too late. The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah have already been led astray by the Christians. They are no more Muslims. They are kuffar.


We have been reading just how much of what is believed to be part of the religion of Ahlus Sunnah and Shiah are actually plagiarized from the Bible. Todate we have seen that NONE - absolutely NOT ONE of the religious practices of the Sunnis and the Shiahs can be found detailed inside their own Quran. Circumcision is definitely one of them. Another big one is their five daily prayers. None of these things which the Sunnis (and Shiahs) believe in is found inside the Quran.
Over the years I have been asking the Sunnis and Shiahs again and again to show me at least one thing they do in their religion which is definitely from the Quran. So far they have not been able to show me anything at all.

Even something as mundane and simple as their greeting is different from the greeting taught to us inside the Quran. The Sunnis and Shiahs say ‘Assalamu Alaikum’. This is not found in the Quran. The Quran says ‘Salamun Alaikum’ - a slight yet major difference. Do not take such differences slightly. But the point is proven - even their ‘Assalamu Alaikum’ is different from what is in their own Quran.

We have seen so far that many of their beliefs are taken from the Christian Bible. We have seen that even the Ahlul Sunnah concept of ‘aqeedah’ or faith is plagiarized from the Hebrew Bible. Even ‘aqeedah’ is a Hebrew word. In the Quran you cannot find the word ‘aqeedah’. Only derivatives like ‘uqudat’ and ‘aqada’ are mentioned but they do not carry the same concept as ‘aqeedah’ which has been plagiarized from the Bible by the Ahlul Sunnah.

Well here is one more item on the list of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah beliefs that is not found anywhere in the Quran but is stolen from the Christian Bible : Circumcision.

The Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah believe that circumcision is a part of their religious belief. They believe that the Prophet taught them to circumcise their children. The situation is so bad that the Sunnis even circumcise their female children. The mutilation of female genitalia is a serious problem in Africa and the Middle East.

The truth is GOD never asked the Sunnis or Shiahs to circumcise anyone. On the contrary GOD says that He made the human in a perfect shape:
[Surah 40:64.24] "GOD it is Who appointed for you the earth for a dwelling-place and the sky for a canopy, and fashioned you and perfected your shapes, and hath provided you with good things. Such is GOD, your Lord. Then blessed be GOD, the Lord of the Worlds!"
So GOD has made us perfect - including the foreskin on the male and the genitalia of the female. There is no need for any smart Sunnis or Shiahs to try and improve on GOD’s creation - even as an option, an exercise of freewill or whatever. Sunnis or anyone else have the freedom and option to cut off their foreskin or to cut off any other part of their body - but that is not part of GOD’s commandments. Let us be clear.
But where does the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah belief in circumcision come from ?
Once again the answer lies in the Christian Bible. Since many of the early Sunnis were converts from Christianity or Judaism they brought with them their own beliefs and systems that later became the Sunni / Shiah religion. One example is the Covenant of Circumcision from the Bible.
[Gen 17:14.13] Any uncircumcised male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin shall be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant." This is the covenant of circumcision.
Also the following:
[Gen 17:24.16] Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.
[This story is found almost exactly in the Sunni hadith theology. The Sunnis say that Abraham circumcised himself with an adze - a small axe. Ouch ! Here is the false hadith : Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 575: Narrated Abu Huraira: GOD’s Apostle said, "Abraham did his circumcision with an adze at the age of eighty" ].

Here is the rest of the Biblical story about circumcision:
[Gen 17:25.18] And Ishmael his son was thirteen years old when he was circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin.
And here is another particularly cultish ritual from the Bible:
Exod 4:25.11] Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin, and touched Moses' feet with it, and said, "Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me!"
The Sunnis do a similar thing today. The circumcision of a male child is cause for much hullabaloo complete with feasting and flocking together.
So once again we see that the Ahlul Sunnah and the Shiahs are actually very good Christians. They uphold the old Biblical beliefs when almost all of Christendom has abandoned these same Biblical beliefs.


The Ahlul Sunnah have been misled into becoming kuffar or disbelievers because they have abandoned the Quran. Today ask any ulema of Ahlul Sunnah simple basic questions about the Quran and they will stare at you blankly. They do not know the Quran. For example in this book so far I have quoted dozens of verses from the Quran. To the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah these verses will appear like Greek because they have never seen these verses or paid any real attention to the meanings of these verses from their own Quran.
Is it a wonder then that the Prophet will one day complain :
Surah 25.30 “And the Apostle will say: O my Lord! surely my people have taken flight away from the Quran”
Arabic : “Wa qaala rasuulu Ya Rabbi Inna kaumi ittakhazu hadha al Quraana mahjuura !! “
This is what the ulema have done. They have totally abandoned the Quran. So what do the ulema know ? They will only know some information from their fake hadith literature. But that too only in sketchy bits and pieces. They do not even know their hadith properly.
The Ahlul Sunnah say that in their pantheon of fake hadith, the writings of a fellow by the name of Imam Bukhari ‘is second only to the Quran’. They say that without this fake hadith they cannot understand the Quran - a Book which was revealed by GOD and which GOD says is ‘made easy to remember’.
The Quran repeats this particular verse four times :
[Surah 54.17] And certainly We have made the Quran easy for remembrance, but is there anyone who will TAKE HEED ?
This exact same verse is repeated in 54:22, 54:32 and 54:40. To enable mankind to take heed of the Quran, GOD has made the Quran easy to remember. This is actually simple logic. If the Quran is the Book of Guidance for mankind then it must be user friendly. It is really easy to remember the Quranic teachings. The reader will see how easily the writer can regurgitate appropriate verses throughout this book. Yet the writer has read the Quran from cover to cover only once in his lifetime – and that too in translation only. It just sticks to your head. But once again the ulema also reject this verse from the Quran. They do not believe that the Quran can be understood easily without their ‘second only to the Quran’ collection of fake Bukhari hadith.
But the ulema themselves have not read the Bukhari collection of fake hadith from cover to cover. If they had done so they would have discovered that while the Quran has 6,346 verses, the collection of fake Bukhari hadith tries to explain only one third or less of the 6,348 verses of the Mushaf of which 9:128&129 do NOT even belong into the Quran. There are not enough fake Bukhari hadith to explain the whole Quran.
And the ulema do not realise that in the fake hadith of Bukhari they will come across the following words “No hadith were recorded here” as Bukhari’s ‘explanation’ for 28 surahs or chapters of the Quran. (See Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6 - Tafsir of the Quran, translation by Dr Muhammad Muhsin Khan, University Medina Al Munawwara).
In other words Bukhari himself admits that he was not able to record any hadith to explain 28 complete surahs or chapters of the Quran. That is 25 percent of the 114 surahs in the Quran. And the remaining hadith are sketchy, ridiculous and do not explain any of the verses of the Quran at all.
And yet the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah say the collection of fake Bukhari hadith is ‘second only to the Quran’. Here is a really sick description of Bukhari by an Ahlul Sunnah admirer :
“If the rich literature of Hadith is assumed a splendid collection of pearls, Al-Jami'us Sahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those precious pieces of magnificence. A vast, yet shore less ocean having lavishly quenched the thirst of many, it is unanimously held in the high esteem of being 'the most authentic book after the book of GOD' by advocates and adversaries alike’.
They speak with pride about “the dazzling level of measures adopted by Imam Bukahri in preserving the credibility of his 'Sanad' ”. But despite all these ridiculous comments there is no evidence that Imam Bukhari even wrote the so called hadeeth collection known as 'Sahih Bukhari'.
The ulema themselves say that "Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushaymani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema".
This is called the “Ulema Shuffle” otherwise known as double talk. They do not have a single, written collection of hadith which they can say with certainty was written by Imam Bukhari. There is no such thing. What they have are bits and pieces that have been sorted and put together over a period of almost 600 years.

The ulema realize that they stand on empty lies. To cover one lie they create a thousand more lies. To divert attention from the fact that Bukhari is not the author of a complete collection of the fake hadith that is attributed to him, the Ahlul Sunnah ulema say that at least seventy full commentaries have been written on Imam al-Bukhari’s ‘great Sahih’. How this helps prove their case is best left to the ulema to shuffle.
According to the ulema, the most celebrated of these commentaries is “without question the Fath al-Bari (‘Victory of the Creator’) by Imam Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani, a work which was the crown both of its genre and of the Imam’s academic career. It is appreciated by the ulema for the doctrinal soundness of its author, for its complete coverage of Bukhari’s material, its mastery of the relevant Arabic sciences, the wisdom it shows in drawing lessons (fawa’id) from the hadiths it expounds, and its skill in resolving complex disputes over variant readings. For Bukhari’s text has not come down to us in a single uniform version, but exists in several ‘narrations’ (riwayat), of which the version handed down by al-Kushmayhani (d.389) on the authority of Bukhari’s pupil al-Firabri is the one most frequently accepted by the ulema”. ( see “Ibn Hajar Asqalani and his Commentary Fath al-Bari” at http://www.central-mosque.com/biographies/asqalani2.htm and www.thesaurus-islamicus.li).
By the ulema’s own admission their collection of fake Bukhari hadith is compiled from a ‘commentary’ on Bukhari by another fellow by the name of Ibnu Hajar Al Askalani.

But this fellow Ibnu Hajar never met Bukhari because according to the ulema Ibnu Hajar Askalani lived and died in 852 AH which is 596 years after Bukhari who is supposed to have lived and died in 256 AH. The ulema say Bukhari never wrote down a completed book. There were no printing presses or photocopy machines or computers available at that time. And 596 years separated Ibnu Hajar from Bukhari. So how did Ibnu Hajar write a commentary about a book that never existed ?

To overcome gaps like these the ulema say that Ibnu Hajar based his writing on the commentary of another fellow called al-Khushaymani who lived and died in 389 AH. Thus they narrow the yawning gap to 463 years. 463 years separated Ibnu Hajar al Askalani and the commentary of al Khushaymani. But even the commentary of al Khushaymani did not exist in one volume or in one collection.

But Khushaymani in turn is still separated from Bukhari by 133 years. Another gap here. To fill this gap the ulema call upon another fellow by the name of al Firabri (Muhammad ibn Yusuf ibn Matar al Firabri 231 – 320 AH) who they say was the missing link and source of the collection of fake hadith from Bukhari (died 256 AH) to Khushaymani (died 389 AH) to Ibnu Hajar (died 852 AH). The reader must carefully bear in mind that despite all these names and throughout this passage of 596 years between Bukhari and Ibnu Hajar, the ulema’s own evidence admits that there never was any complete collection of Bukhari hadith. There was and there is no such thing. The whole thing has been faked by the ulema.
Obviously the claim that Al Askalani wrote his commentary based on Kushaymani is a lie. Askalani never met Kushyamani. 463 years separated them.
The same argument goes for the seventy other commentators ? In fact the number 70 is itself mind boggling. Each of the seventy claims to have his own source. But they are all different (the so called variant readings). The seventy versions (or so they claim) have their own Kushaymanis, Fiabris and Askalanis. They have their own gaps of 400 years, 500 years, 300 years and so on. This guesswork is the basis of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah. With the Shiah it is even worse.

And this is what the ulema say about Ibn Hajar’s commentary on Bukhari hadith:

“Ibn Hajar frequently uses the Kushmayhani variant as his standard text, but gives his reasons, often in complex detail, for preferring other readings where these seem to have particular merit. In doing this he makes it clear that he is authorised, through the ijaza-system, for all the riwayat he cites”.
In other words Ibnu Hajar Askalani merely patched together HIS idea of what he thought the Sahih Bukhari should be. This is because there were variances in the available Bukhari hadeeth. It is just guesswork. This is what they have today which they call the Sahih Bukhari.
And again despite talking so much about the fake Bukhari hadith the ulema still say that " there are few hadith which can be understood adequately without reference to the often complex debates which have taken place concerning them between the scholars. "

According to the ulema few hadith can be understood without referring to the complex debates among the ulema. This is a lark. The ulema say that the hadith explains the Quran. Now they say without their complex debates you cannot even understand the hadith.

We are expected to believe that the Almighty GOD who created the universe, the sky, the animals and the humans will now have to depend on the complex debates between the ulema before the human being can understand the Quran - GOD’s guidance for mankind. Such arrogant boasts by the ulema can only arise from extreme kuffar.

And despite talking so much, the collection of fake Bukhari hadith still says ‘No hadith were recorded here’ as the explanation for 28 surahs of the Quran. Bukhari does not have enough fake hadith to explain the Quran !

The reader is also requested to see the chapter which lists totally stupid and ridiculous hadith from Bukhari. To conclude this chapter, here is just one example :

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188:
Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun:
During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.

Lets just call this the Monkey hadith !


Here are some really stupid Bukhari hadith. The reader must bear in mind that this stupidity is despite “Al-Jami'us Sahih of Imam al-Bukhari is rightfully privileged to be called a gigantic ocean serenely flowing for the providence and safeguard of those precious pieces of magnificence”.

Here are some of those precious pieces of magnificence :

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 9, Number 490: Narrated 'Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, "Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman." I said, "You have made us (i.e. women) dogs. I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him."

So women are like dogs and donkeys.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease."

Perhaps this is why the Ahlul Sunnah will continue to buy pharmaceutical products from the West. Dunking flies in your tea spreads disease.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 5: Narrated 'Ata: We presented ourselves along with Ibn 'Abbas at the funeral procession of Maimuna at a place called Sarif. Ibn 'Abbas said, "This is the wife of the Prophet so when you lift her bier, do not Jerk it or shake it much, but walk smoothly because the Prophet had nine wives and he used to observe the night turns with eight of them, and for one of them there was no night turn."

This is a mystery.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 6: Narrated Anas: The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.

But the other hadith just said someone missed a turn.

Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 7: Narrated Said bin Jubair: Ibn 'Abbas asked me, "Are you married?" I replied, "No." He said, "Marry, for the best person of this (Muslim) nation (i.e., Muhammad) of all other Muslims, had the largest number of wives."

The more wives one has the better Muslim one becomes. Hmmm…

Mahmood bin Rabe narrates, “I still remember when I was five years old, the Holy Prophet rinsed his mouth and then spat the water into mine” (Bukhari Kitabul Ilm vol.2, hadith 77).

Perhaps an adjunct to the ‘dip the fly in your tea’ cure for diseases.

The (Exalted) Messenger used to visit all nine of his wives every night (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52).

The Holy Messenger used to have intercourse with all of his wives in one hour of the day and night (without taking a bath) and these (wives) were eleven.

The Holy Prophet had the (sexual) power of 30 men (Bukhari, Book of Bath 1:189).

The Prophet said that the best man amongst his followers is the one who has the greatest number of wives (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:52).

The Holy Prophet asked, “Who will buy this slave from me?” Hazrat Naeem bought him for 800 Darham (Bukhari, Kitabul Ikrah p.669).

The hadith Bukhari has made the Prophet a slave trader !

The sun rises between the two antlers of Satan (Bukhari 2:134).

And we thought the sun rose over the Land of the Rising Sun !

After the fall of Khyber, people described the beauty of Safia Bint Hui, the new bride of a slain enemy soldier. The Prophet chose her for himself. On the way to Madina he stopped and had intercourse with her. His companions did not know if she was a wife or a concubine. Later, a veil was drawn between her and the men-folk and they came to know that she was a wife (Bukhari, Book of Sales and Book of Nikah 3:59).

From slave trading to sleeping with 9 or 11 women in one night to sleeping with the prisoners of war ! Indeed Bukhari makes the Prophet of Islam to be a real superhero and a gentleman !

The Prophet said, “Bad luck, misfortune and doom can exist in a wife, a home and a horse” (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:60).

“After my time, the greatest tribulation for men will be women” (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:61).

I saw that most of those entering the gate of hellfire were women (Bukhari, Book of Nikah 3:97).

Again the slanderous statements against women. They were like dogs and donkeys. Now they are like horses too. And of course the women will entere the hellfire in large numbers.

Fitna (tribulation) is in the East (Bukhari, Book of Talaq 3:132).

Maybe Bukhari’s compass was broken ?

Aisha said to the Prophet, “Ah! My head is bursting.” He said, “I wish it did.” Aisha responded: “You want me to die so that you can spend the next night with another wife” (Bukhari, Book of Medicine, vol.3).

Maybe Aishah was the woman who did not get her turn that particular night ?

A man inquired, “We earn income from these bondwomen, (other narratives mention prostitution) so can we do coitus interruptus with them?” The Prophet said, “There is no sin in doing that” (Bukhari Kitabul Qadr 3:543).

Some people got sick in Madina. The Prophet advised them to drink camel's urine and milk. After they became well, they killed a shepherd. The Prophet ordered that their hands and feet be chopped off and their eyes enucleated. They were laid on burning sand. When they asked for water it was denied them. So much so that they tasted sand until they died (Bukhari Kitabul Mahrabain and Kitabut Tib p.254).

More organic medical prescriptions. From flies to camels urine.

Seeing a black woman in a dream is the sign of an oncoming epidemic (Bukhari Kitabul Ta'abir).

Does this mean black people must dream about white people too ?

The Prophet’s wives awoke late one morning. He said, “Many women who are dressed up in this world will be raised unclothed in the Hereafter” (Bukhari Kitabul Fatan 3:718).

Another mystery.

The Prophet used to become very restless and frightened whenever he saw the sky overcast (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213).

Prophet was also superstitious ?

The hellfire complained to GOD, "One part of me is eating the other part." So, the hellfire was allowed two breaths - one in summer and one in winter. That is how you see the change of seasons (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:231).

Only in the Arab countries. The deserts are hot like hell anyway.

Azan, (the call to prayer), puts Satan to flight, expelling gas as he runs away (Bukhari Beginning of Creation 2:237).

Satan should not eat so much Jalapeno beans.

Satan rests at night in your noses (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:241).

And that is why when your nose itches at night you should not scratch.

A rooster sees angels, and a donkey sees Satan (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:213).

That’s why donkeys are donkeys and roosters are roosters.

Rats are the lost tribe of Israel because they drink not the camel's milk, but drink goat’s milk (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:244).

But goat’s milk is so expensive. Rats have expensive tastes.

Five animals are sinful, so kill them even in Makkah: rat, scorpion, eagle, crow, and a biting dog (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:245).

What about smiling dogs ?

The Prophet ordered the killing of dogs (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:247).

What would you expect – after slave trading and sleeping with prisoners of war.

Woman was created from the rib so she will always remain crooked. Leave her crooked (Bukhari, Beginning of Creation 2:251).

Maimoona said that she gazed at the Prophet taking a bath after intercourse, until she saw him wash his private parts (Bukhari, The Book of Bath 1:193).

Before the Prophet the men never washed their private parts ?

If the Prophet wanted to have intercourse with a menstruating wife, he ordered her to tie a loincloth even though the menstruation would be at its peak. Then he had intercourse. Whoever has concocted this hadith adds a contrary statement: Aisha said, "No one of you has as much control over his desire as the Prophet had!" (Bukhari The Book on Menstruation 1:98, chapter 207).

Abu Hurairah narrates that the Prophet said, "I was praying. Satan came in front of me and tried to force me to break my prayers. GOD gave me control over him and I threw him down. I thought of tying him with a pillar so that you could see him in the morning (Bukhari 1:469, chapter 766).

The Quran says ‘The satan and his tribe can see you from places while you cannot see them’ Surah 7:27.

The Messenger of GOD addressed his wife Safia as “O’ you bald-headed perished one!” (Bukhari, Kitab Talaq p.143).

Umro bin Maimoon reported, “I saw a monkey surrounded by a swarm of other monkeys. He had committed adultery with a female monkey. So, all monkeys stoned him to death. I cast stones, too.” 
A variation of this
hadith reports, “The female monkey had been lying down with a middle-aged male when a young male came and gestured with his eye. The female slowly pulled her hand away from under the head of the middle-aged monkey and tiptoed away from him. Then she committed adultery with the young monkey. The older monkey got wind of what had happened so he yelled and gathered around him all monkeys in the vicinity. They stoned both (the adulterers) to death!” (Bukhari 2:261).

More monkey jurisprudence for the Ahlul Sunnah.

When a woman refuses to come to her husband’s bed, angels curse her until she returns (Bukhari, Book of Nikah p.96).

Hadith #185 narrates that once the Holy Prophet asked for a bowl of water. He washed his hands and face in it. Then he rinsed his mouth in it and after that ordered Abu Musa and Bilal to drink the used water!

The Book of Bath #246: Abu Salma and the brother of Aisha went to Aisha to learn about the bath after sexual intercourse. She procured a container of water and took a bath. There was a veil between them and her.

It was Home Science. You have to teach the younger generation how to wash your private parts.

The Holy Prophet passed a group of women. He said to them, “Ladies, give alms, because I have seen you burning in hell in great numbers.”
When the women asked the reason for it, he said:
v “You women curse too much!”
v “You are ungrateful to your husbands.”
v “In spite of being deficient in intellect as well as in religion, you are capable of prevailing over a man of wisdom; you are a creation the like of which has never been seen.”
v “Is not the testimony of a woman one half that of a man? This is the measure of deficiency of your intellect!”
v “And mind you, when a woman has her periods she is not allowed to pray or to fast. This is the measure of your deficiency in religion.”


It is a fact that until today slavery is freely practised in the Ahlul Sunnah countries like Saudi Arabia and the Sudan. They have learned this from the Christian Bible.

Of course the larger definition of slavery would put almost the whole of the Third World into the class of slavery. There is much slavery in India, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Phillipines. This is institutionalised slavery on a national scale sustained by illiteracy, ignorance, the caste system in Pakistan and India and the consequent poverty. Some may call it ‘marginalisation’ or other fancy names but it is still slavery. President Nelson Mandela, a true Muslim, calls it the slavery of poverty.

But in the Ahlul Sunnah theology, in their so called fake hadeeth and fake sunnah (may GOD save us from them) they have clear cut references to slavery. This is an evil satanic belief that the Ahlul Sunnah have inherited from their Biblical fathers.

For example the famous book of Ahlul Sunnah jurisprudence ie the Al Muwatta of Imam Malik has a detailed chapter on SLAVES. Imam Malik tells the Ahlul Sunnah how to buy and sell slaves, how a father can bequeath female slaves to his son (if the father has had sex with the female slave, then the son cannot have sex with them – they can only do housework !!!) and other such satanic teachings.

The Quran tells all human beings (and not just the Muslims) to free the slaves. The Quran lists the freeing of slaves as a part of righteousness.

[Surah 2:177] It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces to the East and the West; but righteous is he who believeth in GOD and the Last Day and the angels and the Scripture and the prophets; and giveth wealth, for love of Him, to kinsfolk and to orphans and the needy and the wayfarer and to those who ask, and to set slaves free; and observeth proper worship and payeth the poor-due. And those who keep their treaty when they make one, and the patient in tribulation and adversity and time of stress. Such are they who are sincere. Such are the GOD-fearing.

This commandment applies to everyone – and not just to the Muslims. Assuming you are someone who considers himself a Muslim and assuming you had some slaves, after reading the Quranic command above you would immediately have to set the slaves free. Otherwise you cannot call yourself a Muslim. You are not righteous. End of slavery. End of discussion.

But the satanic Biblical copycats like Imam Malik can write detailed chapters on how a father and son team can go about having sexual intercourse with their female slaves. That is the satanic Ahlul Sunnah ulema for you, folks.

In another example, the Quran enjoins charity (sadaqah) and even details the purposes of the sadaqah charity - among which is the freeing of the slaves.

[Surah 9:60] “The charities (sadaqah) are only for the poor and the needy, and those who collect them, and those whose hearts are to be reconciled, and to free the slaves and the debtors, and for the cause of GOD, and (for) the wayfarer; a duty imposed by GOD. GOD is Knower, Wise.”

The purpose of sadaqah or charity is also to free the slaves. It is ridiculous to say that the Prophet allowed slavery (as has been suggested by the satanic ulema ) when the Quran enjoins the collection of alms to free those same slaves.

But the same does not hold for the Ahlul Sunnah or the Shiahs. They allow the capture of slaves, the keeping of slaves, the trading of slaves, sex with slaves, inheriting slaves from father to son and many other kinds of satanic evil. That is the evil of the Ahlul Sunnah for you.

The following is another commandment in the Quran. Again this applies to all human beings and not just to the Muslims:

[an-Nur 24:33] And let those who cannot find a match keep chaste till GOD give them independence by His grace. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), write it for them if ye are aware of aught of good in them, and bestow upon them of the wealth of GOD which He hath bestowed upon you. Force not your slave-girls to whoredom that ye may seek enjoyment of the life of the world, if they would preserve their chastity. And if one force them, then (unto them), after their compulsion, lo! GOD will be Forgiving, Merciful.

If anyone has a slave and the slave asks for their freedom, then we must give them their freedom in writing (IMMEDIATELY) and also give them a share of your money. Not only is the Quran a liberating document, it is sometimes a little socialistic too. Try suggesting this to the Saudis, the Pakistanis, the Sudanese and the Indians etc.

But where do the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah learn this terrible evil about slavery ?
You guessed it folks. It comes straight from the Bible.
[Lev 25:46.20] You may bequeath them to your sons after you, to inherit as a possession for ever; you may make slaves of them, but over your brethren the people of Israel you shall not rule, one over another, with harshness.

There is a frighteningly similar suggestion by Imam Malik in his textbook the Al Muwatta. The Bible also has more suggestions on what to do with slaves

[Lev 25:44.18] As for your male and female slaves whom you may have: you may buy male and female slaves from among the nations that are round about you.

Biblical teaching indeed. You can make slaves of other races around you.
Again this is also practised by the Saudis until today. Their belief is that they can make slaves of other races. Until today the common derogatory term for Pakistani contract workers in Saudi Arabia is ‘abd’ or ‘abdul’ which means slave. This is Ahlul Sunnah slavery for you.

[Lev 22:10] "An outsider shall not eat of a holy thing. A sojourner of the priest's or a hired servant shall not eat of a holy thing;
[Lev 22:11] but if a priest buys a slave as his property for money, the slave may eat of it; and those that are born in his house may eat of his food.

Here the Bible even allows the priests to buy and keep slaves. No doubt the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah have borrowed this idea too.

[Exod 21:32.6] If the ox gores a slave, male or female, the owner shall give to their master thirty shekels of silver, and the ox shall be stoned

Hence the Bible suggests the value of a slave ie thirty shekels of silver.

Right minded christians ignore such teachings of the Bible today (or do they ?) It is too shameful. Satanic. But not the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah. The ulema of Ahlul Sunnah are the best Christians in the whole world. They have abandoned the Quran.


In the religion of Ahlul Sunnah women occupy a low second class position in society. In the Shiah religion, women occupy an even lower rung in the second class citizenship sweepstakes. Why ? This is because the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs have adopted really cruel Biblical teachings which aim to put down the women in society.

We know the prescription of the headcover or ‘hijaab’ for women which is an entirely Christian invention found in the Bible in the 1st Book of Corinthians, Chapter 11. Mother Theresa was the best example of a hijaab wearing woman.

These teachings are not found anywhere in the Quran. They are not part of the Prophet’s teachings. These are falsehoods stolen or plagiarised from the Christian Bible and then passed off as part of the religion of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah.

Another example by which the Ahlul Sunnah and Shiahs put down their women is by telling the women that they are unclean when the women are menstruating. The degree of torture on the women varies between the various sects and subsects of Ahlul Sunnah and Shiah.

For example, the Ahlul Sunnah say that when a woman is menstruating she cannot pray. A menstruating woman cannot go to the mosque. A menstruating woman cannot touch the Quran. A menstruating woman cannot fast. A menstruating woman cannot perform the haj.

Similarly when a Sunni woman gives birth, she is considered spiritually unclean for varying periods of time usually forty days, 30 days or whatever – depending on which Sunni sect she belongs to. She has many restrictions imposed on her during this time. Such is the false religion of Ahlul Sunnah.

You can never find these false ideas in the Prophet’s true teachings which is the Quran. But where do these strange ideas come from ? Yes sir/madam you guessed it. It all comes from the Christian Bible.

[Lev 12:2] "Say to the people of Israel, If a woman conceives, and bears a male child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as at the time of her menstruation, she shall be unclean.

[Lev 12:4] Then she shall continue for thirty-three days in the blood of her purifying; she shall not touch any hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary, until the days of her purifying are completed.

Seven plus thirty three = forty days of uncleanness, exactly the same period of uncleanness prescribed by the Ahlul Sunnah for post delivery mothers.

[Lev 12:5] But if she bears a female child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her menstruation; and she shall continue in the blood of her purifying for sixty-six days.

The discrimination against women starts early. The period of uncleanness if a girl child is born is 80 days.

The Quran does address the issue of the women’s menses. Lets look at the following beautiful and simple teaching of the Quran :

[al-Baqarah 2:222] They question thee (O Prophet) concerning menstruation. Say: It is an illness, so let women alone at such times and go not in unto them till they are cleansed. And when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as GOD hath enjoined upon you. Truly GOD loveth those who turn unto Him, and loveth those who have a care for cleanness.

The only teaching here in the Quran is that during their menstruation men should not approach women for sex (“and go not in unto them till they are cleansed”) because they are unclean. Why ? Because they are having their period. After they are clean, men can resume their relations with women ( And when they have purified themselves, then go in unto them as GOD hath enjoined upon you).

It does not take a rocket scientist to figure this out. There is a multi billion dollar female hygiene products market that caters exclusively for women’s hygiene. Everyone knows that. Even the non Muslims know this. But having their periods does not prevent women from driving cars, teaching at school, breaking the Olympic record, sailing around the world or cooking for their Sunni husbands.

The false teachings about menstruation are nothing more than a fabrication by their Ahlul Sunnah ulema to impose Biblical teachings upon the Ahlul Sunnah.


The false religion of Ahlul Sunnah believes that one should not make statues of animals and humans. They say that the act of having statues of humans and animals will lead to idol worship. They also disallow the making of woodcarvings, moulds and also the drawing or painting of pictures that have animals or human forms.

Of course with the advent of newspapers, television, videos etc it is a little ridiculous for the Ahlul Sunnah to insist on such foolish beliefs. But the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah have learnt the value of publicity. They will not mind being photographed by the newspapers or being filmed for the television news coverage. It means more money for them. The Ahlul Sunnah ulema of Saudi Arabia have come up with a simple solution to get around the problem of having their ‘graven images’ recorded on photographs. They say that a photograph is just like a mirror that reflects a human beings face. It is just that in a photograph, the image stays. So it is alright.

First they make the silly little rules. Then they find their own even more silly loopholes to break their own silly little rules.

Again you will not find such silly beliefs in the teachings of the Prophet which is the Quran. But you will most definitely find such teachings in the Christian Bible. The Christian Bible calls it the worship of ‘graven images’. It is found in the following verses of the Bible:

[Deut 4:16] beware lest you act corruptly by making a graven image for yourselves, in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female,

[Deut 4:14] And the LORD commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and ordinances, that you might do them in the land which you are going over to possess.

[Deut 4:15] "Therefore take good heed to yourselves. Since you saw no form on the day that the LORD spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the fire,

[Deut 4:16] beware lest you act corruptly by making a graven image for yourselves, in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female,

[Deut 4:17] the likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged bird that flies in the air,

[Deut 4:18] the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the water under the earth.

So the Christians and their religious cousins the Ahlul Sunnah or the Sunnis are not allowed to make graven images of birds, animals, fish, humans and other beings. This is known as Ahlul Sunnah Christianity.

The strange thing is that the Christians do not follow their own Bible’s prohibitions about ‘Graven Images’ anymore. Hence the Catholic churches are full of statues, cherubs, angels, Mary Mother of --- and so on. But the Ahlul Sunnah have taken this Biblical teachings to greater heights. Their so called ‘Ahlul Sunnah’ art has been reduced to nothing more than arabic calligraphy (there is no Chinese or Indian ‘Ahlul Sunnah’ calligraphy) and making geometric patterns because the Ahlul Sunnah have been obeying strictly the Biblical prohibitions on creating ‘Graven Images’ of humans and animals.

But according to the teachings of the Prophet this should not be the case.
No less a person than a Prophet, a Messenger of GOD by the name of Solomon was actively engaged in the making of statues. This is what the Quran says:

[Surah 34:12] And unto Solomon (We gave) the wind, whereof the morning course was a month's journey and the evening course a month's journey, and We caused the fount of copper to gush forth for him, and (We gave him) certain of the jinn who worked before him by permission of his Lord. And such of them as deviated from Our command, them We caused to taste the punishment of flaming Fire.

[Surah 34:13] They made for him what he willed: buildings and STATUES, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground. Give thanks, O House of David! Few of My bondmen are thankful.

GOD gave the Prophet Solomon control over the elements and also control over the jinns (genies). And Solomon commandeered the genies to make for him “buildings and STATUES, basins like wells and boilers built into the ground”.

And for all this Solomon (who was David’s heir) was thankful to his GOD. “Give thanks, O House of David! Few of My bondmen are thankful”.

Hence there is nothing wrong in creating statues, artforms or paintings that have human and animal forms in them. Once again this is just another example of the Biblical teachings that have been absorbed by the Ahlul Sunnah.

To Part 3